How to analyze Structure and Function in Tissue â€“ based Diagnosis?
Background: Tissue â€“ based diagnosis (morphological analysis of human tissue) judges, measures and interprets morphologic images which have been acquired from human tissue. It translates the findings into a diagnosis or description of biological functions. What are its principle algorithms and theoretical background?
Theory:Pathologists are used to distinguish between structure and function. Biological structures are ordered clusters of material (genes, nuclei, cells, organs, etc.), which remain constant during the period of detection and observation. They are commonly embedded or appear in circumscribed spaces. These spaces are clearly separated from their environment (background). Functions are forces that act on structures. They modify their appearance, create and delete structures and their spatial relationship. The recognition of both structures and functions is dependent upon the observation time: Material that remains unchanged within the observation period is called structure, its changes between a series of observations a function.
Derivatives: Biological structures and functions should be interpreted in relation to the observation time. Functions can be considered structural gradients of time or of observation periods.
Implementation: The analysis of conventional stained histological slides reflects to a short non changeable observation time, which in reality cannot be repeated at different times on the same tissue. Acquired digital images such as virtual slides (VS) offer the opportunity of simulating different observation times if object features are analyzed that reflect structural changes at different times. The measurement of immunohistochemal intensity levels performed on the same structure can be considered a time series of the binding or antigen â€“ antibody process. The obtained frame of these measurements can be mapped on chemical significant descriptors such as Shannonâ€™s and structural entropy, and their entropy flows.
Material and Methods: Histological glass slides displaying with kidneys of 39 chicken embryos were incubated with AP labelled galectin-3. In addition, 20 control cases were analyzed. One snapshot per case was digitalized and the staining intensity was measured in relation to a series of segmentation grey levels (0 â€“ 255). The data were mapped on the principal measures Shannonâ€™s and structural entropy as well as on the entropy flow derived from texture analysis.
Results: The mapped functions of entropies display with significant changes between the galectin-3 positive images and their negative control counterparts. The data indicate that the binding capacities of galectin-3 hold a significant function during the development of foetal chicken kidneys.
Conclusions: Laboratory techniques that simulate time-related series of measurements can be used to describe and interpret biological functions in living organisms at the cellular level.
2. Kayser , K., B. Molnar, and R.S. Weinstein, Virtual Microscopy Fundamentals - Applications - Perspectives of Electronic Tissue - based Diagnosis. 2006, Berlin: VSV Interdisciplinary Medical Publishing.
3. Randell, R., et al., Diagnosis of major cancer resection specimens with virtual slides: impact of a novel digital pathology workstation. Hum Pathol. 45(10): p. 2101-6.
4. Patel HD, J.M., Pierorazio PM, Sozio SM, Sharma R, Iyoha E, Bass EB, Allaf ME., Diagnostic Accuracy and Risks of Biopsy in the Diagnosis of a Renal Mass Suspicious for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of the Literature. J Urol., 2016. 18(doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.029. [Epub ahead of print]).
5. Bilous, M., et al., Predicting the HER2 status of breast cancer from basic histopathology data: an analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 International Study. Breast, 2003. 12(2): p. 92-8.
6. Kayser, K., Quantification of virtual slides: Approaches to analysis of content-based image information. J Pathol Inform. 2: p. 2.
7. Aitken, S.J., et al., Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases. Ann Oncol. 21(6): p. 1254-61.
8. Kayser, G., et al., Stromal CD4/CD25 positive T-cells are a strong and independent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients, especially with adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer. 76(3): p. 445-51.
9. Kayser, K., et al., Texture and object related image analysis in microscopic images. Diagnostic Pathology, 2015. 1(14).
10. Zito, C.I., et al., Direct resequencing of the complete ERBB2 coding sequence reveals an absence of activating mutations in ERBB2 amplified breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2008. 47(7): p. 633-8.
11. Kumar V, P.S., Bayda S, Corona G, Toffoli G, Rizzolio F., DNA Nanotechnology for Cancer Therapy. Theranostics, 2016. 6(5): p. 710-25.
12. Kayser, K., et al., Digitized pathology: theory and experiences in automated tissue-based virtual diagnosis. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2006. 47(1): p. 21-8.
13. Schmitt, F., HER2+ breast cancer: how to evaluate? Adv Ther, 2009. 26 Suppl 1: p. S1-8.
14. Racoceanu, D. and P. Belhomme, Breakthrough technologies in digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 42: p. 1.
15. Kayser, K., et al., Texture- and object-related automated information analysis in histological still images of various organs. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 2008. 30(6): p. 323-35.
16. Kayser, K. and H.J. Gabius, The application of thermodynamic principles to histochemical and morphometric tissue research: principles and practical outline with focus on the glycosciences. Cell Tissue Res, 1999. 296(3): p. 443-55.
17. Kayser, K., et al., To be at the right place at the right time. Diagn Pathol. 6: p. 2-9.
18. Claude Elwood Shannon, W.W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication. 1963, Chicago: University of Illinois Press
19. Tsallis, C. and A.M. Souza, Constructing a statistical mechanics for Beck-Cohen superstatistics. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2003. 67(2 Pt 2): p. 026106.
20. Weinstein, Y.S., S. Lloyd, and C. Tsallis, Border between regular and chaotic quantum dynamics. Phys Rev Lett, 2002. 89(21): p. 214101.
21. Kayser, K. and H. Hoffgen, Pattern recognition in histopathology by orders of textures. Med Inform (Lond), 1984. 9(1): p. 55-9.
22. Kayser, K. and W. Schlegel, Pattern recognition in histo-pathology: basic considerations. Methods Inf Med, 1982. 21(1): p. 15-22.
23. Szoke, T., et al., Prognostic significance of endogenous adhesion/growth-regulatory lectins in lung cancer. Oncology, 2005. 69(2): p. 167-74.
24. Zink, S., et al., Survival, disease-free interval, and associated tumor features in patients with colon/rectal carcinomas and their resected intra-pulmonary metastases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2001. 19(6): p. 908-13.
25. Kayser, K., et al., Pulmonary metastases of breast carcinomas: ligandohistochemical, nuclear, and structural analysis of primary and metastatic tumors with emphasis on period of occurrence of metastases and survival. J Surg Oncol, 1998. 69(3): p. 137-46.
26. Hagemeyer, O., H.J. Gabius, and K. Kayser, Paraganglioma of the lung--developed after exposure to nuclear radiation by the Tschernobyl atomic reactor accident? Respiration, 1994. 61(4): p. 236-9.
27. Kayser, K., et al., Atherosclerosis-associated changes in the carbohydrate-binding capacities of smooth muscle cells of various human arteries. Zentralbl Pathol, 1993. 139(4-5): p. 307-12.
28. Kayser, K., et al., Correlation of expression of binding sites for synthetic blood group A-, B- and H-trisaccharides and for sarcolectin with survival of patients with bronchial carcinoma. Eur J Cancer, 1994. 30A(5): p. 653-7.
29. Kayser, K., et al., Expression of lectin, interleukin-2 and histopathologic blood group binding sites in prostate cancer and its correlation with integrated optical density and syntactic structure analysis. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 1995. 17(2): p. 135-42.
30. Moles Lopez, X., et al., An automated blur detection method for histological whole slide imaging. PLoS One. 8(12): p. e82710.
31. Oger, M., et al., Automated region of interest retrieval and classification using spectral analysis. Diagn Pathol, 2008. 3 Suppl 1: p. S17.
32. Park, S., et al., The history of pathology informatics: A global perspective. J Pathol Inform. 4: p. 7.
33. Yagi, Y., et al., The First Congress of the International Academy of Digital Pathology: digital pathology comes of age. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 35(1): p. 1-2.
34. Kayser, K., et al., AI (artificial intelligence) in histopathology--from image analysis to automated diagnosis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 2009. 47(3): p. 355-61.
35. Kayser, K., et al., How to measure diagnosis-associated information in virtual slides. Diagn Pathol. 6 Suppl 1: p. S9.
36. Kayser, K., et al., Interactive and automated application of virtual microscopy. Diagn Pathol. 6 Suppl 1: p. S10.
37. Kayser, K., et al., History and structures of telecommunication in pathology, focusing on open access platforms. Diagn Pathol. 6: p. 110.
38. Al-Janabi, S., et al., Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of urinary system pathology: a feasibility study. J Renal Inj Prev. 3(4): p. 91-6.
39. Gray, A., et al., Quantification of histochemical stains using whole slide imaging: development of a method and demonstration of its usefulness in laboratory quality control. J Clin Pathol. 68(3): p. 192-9.
40. Greenbaum, A., et al., Wide-field computational imaging of pathology slides using lens-free on-chip microscopy. Sci Transl Med. 6(267): p. 267ra175.
41. Kayser, K., S. Borkenfeld, and G. Kayser, How to introduce virtual microscopy (VM) in routine diagnostic pathology: constraints, ideas, and solutions. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 35(1): p. 3-10.
42. Wright, A.I., H.I. Grabsch, and D.E. Treanor, RandomSpot: A web-based tool for systematic random sampling of virtual slides. J Pathol Inform. 6: p. 8.
43. Lu, S.Y., A tree-to-tree distance and its application to cluster analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Maschine Intelligence, 1979. PAMI-1: p. 219-234.
44. Lu, S.Y. and K.S. Fu, A syntactic approach to texture analysis. Computer Garphics Image Processing, 1978. 7: p. 303 - 330.
45. Prewitt, J.M.S. and S.C. Wu. An application of pattern recognition to epithelial tissues. in Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1978: IEEE Computer Society.
46. Sanfeliu, A., K.S. Fu, and J.M.S. Prewitt. An application ofa distance measure between graphs to the analysis of muscle tissue patterns. in Workshop on Structural and Syntactic Pattern recognition. 1981. Saratoga Springs, New Yorck.
47. Kayser, K., et al., New developments in digital pathology: from telepathology to virtual pathology laboratory. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2004. 105: p. 61-9.
48. AndrÃ© S, K.H., Kayser K, Murphy PV, Gabius HJ., Merging carbohydrate chemistry with lectin histochemistry to study inhibition of lectin binding by glycoclusters in the natural tissue context.
. Histochem Cell Biol., 2016. 145(2): p. 185-99.
49. Corredor, G., E. Romero, and M. Iregui, An adaptable navigation strategy for Virtual Microscopy from mobile platforms. J Biomed Inform.
50. Khalbuss, W.E., J. Cuda, and I.C. Cucoranu, Screening and dotting virtual slides: A new challenge for cytotechnologists. Cytojournal. 10: p. 22.
51. Virchow, R., Cellular Pathologie. Virchows. Arch. Path. Anat., 1855. 8: p. 3-39.
52. Kayser, G., et al., Poor outcome in primary non-small cell lung cancers is predicted by transketolase TKTL1 expression. Pathology. 43(7): p. 719-24.
53. Werle, B., et al., Cathepsin B in infiltrated lymph nodes is of prognostic significance for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer, 2000. 89(11): p. 2282-91.
54. HJ., G., The magic of the sugar code. Trends Biochem Sci., 2015. 40(7): p. 341.
55. Kaltner H, S.T., Manning JC, Raschta AS, AndrÃ© S, Sinowatz F, Gabius HJ., Network monitoring of adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins: localization of the five canonical chicken proteins in embryonic and maturing bone and cartilage and their introduction as histochemical tools. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015. 298(12): p. 2051-70.
56. Badea P, P.A., Moldovan L, Zarnescu O., Structural heterogenity of intraluminal content of the prostate: a histochemical and ultrastructural study. Microsc Microanal., 2015. 21(2): p. 368-76.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
4. In case of virtual slide publication the authors agree to copy the article in a structural modified version to the journal's VS archive.