Guidelines Digital Pathology for Diagnosis on (and Reports of) Digital Images Version 1.0 Bundesverband deutscher Pathologen e.V. (Federal Association of German Pathologist)

  • Peter Hufnagl Institute of Pathology, Charite – Medical University, Berlin, Germany
  • Ralf Zwönitzer Imassense GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Gunter Haroske Kommission Digitale Pathologie, Bundesverband Deutscher Pathologen e.V., Berlin, Committee Digital Pathology, Professional Association of German Pathologists

Abstract

Digitalization is entering the medical fields with increasing velocity and impact on diagnostic and therapeutic actions. In addition, it matures to a mandatory tool of quality assurance, reliable inter-disciplinary communication, and promotion of research.


The Professional Association of German Pathologists wants to support their members in their thoughts and potential implementation of virtual microscopy and related issues. It founded a committee of digital pathology. Colleagues experienced in routine surgical pathology, information technology and practice have been asked to investigate prerequisites, actual technology stages and financial considerations, and to formulate their recommendations and guidelines.


Herein, the official guidelines of the Professional Association of German Pathologists are presented. The guidelines focus on practical issues, Pathologists as well as IT experts or interested researchers are invited to make use of these guidelines. Our readers are also invited to inquire specific tasks or discuss their ideas and experiences. They might either contact the committee directly, or discuss specific points of view by writing a letter to the editor, or by submission of, and to formulate a corresponding interactive publication.

References

Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug. (kein Datum). Technical Performance Assessment of Digital Pathology Whole Slide Imaging Devices: Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Abgerufen am 20. August 2015 von www.regulations.gov
2. Campbell, W., Hinrichs, S., Lele, S., Baker, J., Lazenby, A., Talmon, G., et al. (2014). Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies. Human Pathology, 45 (8), S. 1713–21.
3. Daniel, C., Booker, D., Beckwith, B., Della Mea, V., Garcia- Rojo, M., Havener, L., et al. (2012). Standards and specifications in pathology: image management, report management and terminology. Stud Health Technol Inform, 179, S. 105–22.
4. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 122: Specimen Module and Revised Pathology SOP Classes.
5. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 145: Whole Slide Microscopic Image IOD and SOP Classes.
6. Jukic, D.M., Drogowski, L.M., Martina, J., et al. Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2011; 135(3):372–378.
7. Pantanowitz, L., Sinard, J., Henricks, W., et al. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013; 137(12):1710–22.
8. Sellaro T.L., Filkins R., Hoffman C., Fine J.L., Ho J., Parwani A.V., et al. Relationship between magnification and resolution in digital pathology systems. J Pathol Inform, 2013; 4:21.
Published
2018-09-08
How to Cite
HUFNAGL, Peter; ZWÖNITZER, Ralf; HAROSKE, Gunter. Guidelines Digital Pathology for Diagnosis on (and Reports of) Digital Images Version 1.0 Bundesverband deutscher Pathologen e.V. (Federal Association of German Pathologist). Diagnostic Pathology, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, sep. 2018. ISSN 2364-4893. Available at: <http://www.diagnosticpathology.eu/content/index.php/dpath/article/view/266>. Date accessed: 26 sep. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.17629/www.diagnosticpathology.eu-2018-4:266.
Section
Methodology