The Role of the Technicians in the Digital Pathology Implementation. Searching Optimization

  • Eduardo Alcaraz-Mateos Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • I. Tortosa-Martinez Morales Meseguer University Hospital (Technician), Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • C. Alcolea-Guardiola Morales Meseguer University Hospital (Technician), Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • S. Estevez-Ligero Morales Meseguer University Hospital (Technician), Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • A. Abellan-Palazon Morales Meseguer University Hospital (Technician), Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • A. Kundisova University of Bratislava, Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • A. Nieto-Olivares Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
  • A. Chaves-Benito Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Pathology Department, Murcia, Spain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17629/www.diagnosticpathology.eu-2016-8:180

Abstract

Introduction/ Background

Scanning histological or cytological preparations is a crucial element in the process of digitization of Pathology Departments, along with the traceability of tissue samples and the reports management. The scanning time and the high size of the files are still considered suboptimal for full implementation.

Aims

In order to optimize time and space a comparative study in our center has been carried out.

Methods

A total  of  25  endoscopic  samples  (5  esophageal,  5 gastric, 5 duodenal, 5 colonic inflammatory, and 5 colonic neoplastic) were selected with the intention of comparing different parameters (scanning time, error rate during scanning and hard disk storage) between the original histological glass slides (group A: 2 slides per case, 50 preparations) and new sections, with levels grouped into a single slide (group B: 1 slide per case, 25 preparations). They were scanned at 20x magnification in routine way using the Ventana iScan scanner Coreo (Roche diagnostics). The process was repeated 4 times to calculate averages.

Results

The average scanning time was 5 hours 40 minutes (6m 48s / slide) in group A and 5 hours 10 minutes (12m 24s/slide) in group B. The error rate was higher than it had been found in previous studies (2-3%) with 6% errors in group A and 3,9% errors in group B. The space occupied on the hard disk was 11.87 GB in group A and 9.6 GB in group B (475 MB/case vs 385 MB/case, respectively). The average number of tissue sections per case was 7 in group A and 8 in group B.

 

Conclusions: There is a clear benefit of standardizing and optimizing the number of cuts per slide in terms of storage (saving 19%), biopsy sampling (14% more tissue) and error rate (35% less), including a not negligible decrease in the scanning time (9%) in the study conducted.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
ALCARAZ-MATEOS, Eduardo et al. The Role of the Technicians in the Digital Pathology Implementation. Searching Optimization. Diagnostic Pathology, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 8, june 2016. ISSN 2364-4893. Available at: <https://www.diagnosticpathology.eu/content/index.php/dpath/article/view/180>. Date accessed: 17 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.17629/www.diagnosticpathology.eu-2016-8:180.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 1 No 8 (2016): 13. European Congress on Digital Pathology
Section
Clinical Workflow Integration
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:


1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

4. In case of virtual slide publication the authors agree to copy the article in a structural modified version to the journal's VS archive.